Iterative Type Analysis and Extended Message Splitting: Optimizing Dynamically-Typed Object-Oriented Programs¶
Craig Chambers and David Ungar
Object-oriented languages have suffered from poor performance caused by frequent and slow dynamically-bound procedure calls. The best way to speed up a procedure call is to compile it out, but dynamic binding of object-oriented procedure calls without static receiver type information precludes inlining. Iterative type analysis and extended message splitting are new compilation techniques that extract much of the necessary type information and make it possible to hoist run-time type tests out of loops.
Our system compiles code on-the-fly that is customized to the actual data types used by a running program. The compiler constructs a control flow graph annotated with type information by simultaneously performing type analysis and inlining. Extended message splitting preserves type information that would otherwise be lost by a control-flow merge by duplicating all the code between the merge and the place that uses the information. Iterative type analysis computes the types of variables used in a loop by repeatedly recompiling the loop until the computed types reach a fix-point. Together these two techniques enable our SELF compiler to split off a copy of an entire loop, optimized for the common-case types.
By the time our SELF compiler generates code for the graph, it has eliminated many dynamically- dispatched procedure calls and type tests. The resulting machine code is twice as fast as that generated by the previous SELF compiler, four times faster than ParcPlace Systems Smalltalk-80, the fastest commercially available dynamically-typed object-oriented language implementation, and nearly half the speed of optimized C. Iterative type analysis and extended message splitting have cut the performance penalty for dynamically-typed object-oriented languages in half.
Proceedings of the SIGPLAN ‘90 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 150-164, White Plains, NY, June, 1990.
Published as SIGPLAN Notices 25(6), June, 1990. Also published in Lisp and Symbolic Computation 4(3), Kluwer Academic Publishers, June, 1991.